As an interesting follow up to my previous post ‘real security – safety vs. liberty’ that can be found here;
I came across the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) blog posting on their 10 best good catches of 2011. Now bear in mind this is their own blog, not an independent news report so can be expected to paint them in the best possible light..;
So mostly forgetful / stupid passengers, the odd criminal and 1 person who took C4 through one airport and only got caught on the return flight.
You will notice ZERO terrorists or terrorist plots foiled. We are beholden to more and more checks that in fact do nothing to catch or prevent terrorism. When will the voice of reason prevail over checks that appear ill conceived and only get enacted as poorly thought knee jerk reactions to previous issues.
The chairman of BA has echoed similar sentiments as quoted in this Daily Telegraph report;
To further back up my opinions on how ridiculous many of these new checks are, I recently flew from Luton to Dublin. On my out I duly had my clear plastic bag of toiletries, all less than 100ml, and a total of well under 1 litre. No problem I thought, I am well prepared. However my bag was a clear tie-handle bag. I was stopped and told they have to be in a resalable zip-lock type bag.
How this will reduce terrorism I do not know? As per the title, has recent research proven that those inclined to blow up or take control of aeroplanes struggle with zip-lock, but can tie handles together?
The problem with all of this is that we as the people who are not actually being served or protected by these extra checks cannot question or challenge them – if you argue or protest you can’t fly, simple as that. It’s about time someone saved us all time, and airports money by reviewing exactly what checks are sensible and needed.